 |
|
2005 National
Symposium on Racial Profiling
|
|
|
Trust emerged as the clear theme of this year's Racial Profiling
Conference. Law enforcement leaders from agencies that had dealt with
racial profiling allegations or court orders reiterated that theme when
discussing mistakes they had made. Panelists explained that the process
of regaining the public's trust can be long and painful. They found out
the hard way that even when data collection proved that their agencies
were not guilty of racial profiling, anecdotes by citizens held a lot
more weight in the media, and an ugly public perception often remained.
Only through a drawn out process of crisis management could that image
be repaired.
The loss of public trust is dealt with frequently in corporate America.
So much so, that Kellogg Management Professor Daniel Diermeier makes a
living teaching executives what to do when things go wrong. During his
well received keynote speech, Diermeier discussed the details of a
crisis faced by Mercedes Benz in Europe. Although the story had nothing
to do with law enforcement, participants said that racial profiling
allegations often played out in a similar way. The following is a short
version of the Mercedes crisis and how it was managed successfully.
In Europe, parking is difficult to find. As a response to the problem,
Mercedes built a new urban minivan that was small enough to park, but
still safe to drive on the same roads with bigger cars. The company had
designed special safety features to make sure the car would survive
front end crash tests. When an enterprising reporter conducted a safety
test that caused the car to roll-over, the company at first tried to
point out that the test was not conducted properly. Mercedes engineers
tested and re-tested and maintained that the car was safe. No one seemed
to hear them. The story of the bad test spread throughout the media.
Despite the fact that the story was not necessarily scientifically
accurate, the perception stuck. Mercedes had to find a way to turn the
crisis into an opportunity.
Even though there was no evidence that the car was unsafe, Mercedes
recalled it, redesigned it, and recovered. The recovery involved
launching a campaign about how Mercedes had re-invented safety with that
very same car. The Mercedes executives felt that the expense of creating
what was probably an unnecessary fix was well worth it, especially when
the Mercedes reputation was at stake. Conference participants
immediately connected with that analogy, many asking to know more about
how to turn a crisis into an opportunity.
Many speakers reminded participants that it was important to involve the
community in the process of traffic stop data collection from the
beginning. Many had set up task forces involving community leaders,
police union representatives, and officers on the street. Everyone was
to get their concerns expressed before the data was collected and
released. They also stressed the importance of using an objective
research partner, such as an area university, to help insure data
credibility.
Those who felt that they dealt successfully with the issue of racial
profiling made sure that they created a clearly written policy against
racial profiling, a complaint process, and training and disciplinary
policies.
While most panelists said they felt that data collection was not a
panacea, they did feel that it plays an important role in preventing
racial profiling. Michael Smith, Professor of Criminology, University of
South Carolina, explained the process of internal benchmarking in
weeding out the few bad apples. Jeff Ridgeway, Statistician, Rand
Corporation outlined a process of analysis used in Oakland, that
supported the police department's claim that officers did not practice
racial profiling.
Kingston, Ontario Police Chief William Closs said that his agency is the
only one in Canada to collect data on traffic stops. Even though most
Canadian agencies deny that racial profiling exists, he realized that a
perception problem existed after his officers pulled a gun on the same
innocent teenager during two different traffic stops. As a result, his
agency holds town meetings on a regular basis and he views data
collection as a bridge to win back public trust.
Wesley Skogan, Professor, Northwestern University, Institute for Policy
Research, predicted that immigration would be the major issue for law
enforcement in the 21st century. Skogan studied the Chicago police
department for ten years and specializes in recognizing the unique needs
of Hispanic immigrants. He said that Chicago police now realize that
many immigrants come from a country where police support oppressive
regimes. Therefore, it is particularly difficult to win their trust.
Language and cultural miscommunications can also create problems. He
said that mass media campaigns did not seem to work to recruit Hispanics
for community policing meetings, but rather that one-on-one contact
works the best.
Nashville Police Chief Ronal Serpas got a tremendous response with his
practical approach to the issue. Serpas says he listens to community
leaders but also urges his officers to learn the neighborhood at the
front porch. Serpas called for a back to the basics approach. "It's
police work to know the names of the people in your neighborhood, their
kids, their family names," said Serpas. "They'll trust you because you
stopped long enough to know who they were." Serpas says he counts on
that trust for greater intelligence gathering, and the community has
supported his officers in times of crisis because of that trust.
Our thanks to the many law enforcement executives who shared their case
studies, RAND Corporation for partnering with the Center, the
researchers who shared their timely information, and the hundreds of
participants from the United States and Canada who were open and honest
in their discussions during Northwestern University Center for Public
Safety's Fourth National Symposium on Racial Profiling. Special thanks
to Keynote Speaker, Professor Daniel Diermeier, for his excellent
presentation, Leading Under Pressure, to Professor David Harris for his
luncheon address, and to Harley Davidson Motor Company for sponsoring
the luncheon.
|
Name |
Title |
Video Clip |
|
Opening Address |
|
Philip J. Cline |
Superintendent, Chicago Police Department |
 |
|
Thomas F. Gibbons |
Dean, Northwestern University School of
Continuing Studies |
|
Jack Riley |
Associate Director, RAND Corp. |
|
Tim Martin |
Secretary, Illinois Department of
Transportation |
|
Keynote Speech |
|
Daniel Diermeier |
IBM Distinguished Professor of Regulation
and Competitive Practice, Northwestern University, Kellogg School of
Management |
 |
|
Racial Profiling -
Historical Overview |
|
Alexander Weiss, Ph.D. |
Director, Northwestern University Center for
Public Safety |
 |
|
Strategies for Internal
Control |
|
Robert McNeilly |
Chief, Pittsburgh Police Department |
 |
|
The Cincinnati Experience |
|
Cindy Combs |
Lieutenant Colonel, Cincinnati Police
Department |
 |
|
Richard Jerome |
Cincinnati Court Monitor |
 |
|
S. Gregory Baker |
Executive Manager of Police Relations,
Cincinnati Police Department |
 |
|
Jeremy Wilson |
Associate Behavioral Scientist, RAND
Corporation |
 |
|
The
State Police Experience |
|
Lowell Porter |
Director, Washington Traffic Safety
Commission |
 |
|
Boyd W. Butler |
Chief, Research and Development, Illinois
State Police |
 |
|
Suzan Cogswell |
Research Administrator, Ohio State Highway
Patrol |
 |
|
John Fogerty |
Chief, Inland Division, California Highway
Patrol |
 |
|
Michael Finamore |
Lt. Colonel, Ohio State Highway Patrol |
 |
|
Policing and the Hispanic
Community |
|
Wesley G. Skogan |
Professor, Institute for Policy Research,
Northwestern University |
|
|
The Community Perspective |
|
Karen Narasaki |
Executive Director, National Asian Pacific
American Legal Consortium |
|
|
Adam Schwartz |
Staff Attorney, ACLU |
|
|
Hilary O. Shelton |
Director, Washington Bureau, NAACP |
|
|
Bishop Filipe Teixeira, OFSJC. |
St. Martin De Porres Catholic Church,
Brockton, Massachusetts |
|
|
Lashawn Warren |
Legislative Counsel, ACLU |
|
|
Ana Yanez-Correa |
Policy Director, League of United Latin
American Citizens of Texas |
|
|
The Oakland Experience |
|
Ronald Davis |
Captain, Oakland Police Department |
 |
|
Jeffrey Grogger |
Professor, Harris School of Public Policy,
University of Chicago |
 |
|
Greg Ridgeway |
Statistician, RAND Corporation |
 |
|
Crime Control and Racial
Profiling |
|
Ronal Serpas |
Chief, Nashville Police Department |
 |
|
Internal Benchmarking |
|
Michael R. Smith |
Professor, Department of Criminology,
University of South Carolina |
 |
|
The Highland Park
Experience |
|
Daniel Dahlberg |
Chief, Highland Park Police Department (ret) |
 |
|
Steven M. Elrod |
Partner, Holland and Knight LLP |
|
David M. Limardi |
City Manager, Highland Park |
|
Paul Shafer |
Chief, Highland Park Police Department |
|
Community Expectations
After Data Collection |
|
William J. Closs |
Kingston, Police Department, Ontario, Canada |
 |
|
Robert Jones |
Chief, Gurnee Police Department, President,
Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police |
 |
Benchmarking Spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel Format)
Assessing Racial
Profiling
Study of Racial
Profiling in Oakland Finds Mixed Evidence
New
Federal Guidelines Ban Racial Profiling
|
|
|
|